public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chris" <hsvchris@gmx.de>
To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:33:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <002a01c83b74$52060330$f6120990$@de> (raw)

Hello!

I'm running a home file server with Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 4.0r1 etch
(2.6.18-5-amd64 Kernel) and an Areca ARC-1220 hardware RAID controller.
I used to have 4 750GB HDDs connected and set up as RAID 5 array, single
volume, single XFS partition (set up during the installation of Debian). No
problems so far.

Now I added another 750GB HDD to the array, online capacity/volume expansion
by the controller finished just fine.
My plan was to add the extra space to the above mentioned XFS partition. So
I unmounted the partition, started cfdisk, removed the partition table and
wrote a new one that included the new free space. 
After rebooting the partition wasn't mounted, so I couldn't use xfs_growth
to expand the filesystem.  

xfs_check: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0x00000000

xfs_repair -n:
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
bad primary superblock - bad magic number !!!
attempting to find secondary superblock.......[...].............found
candidate secondary superblock...unable to verify superblock,
continuing..........[...]................
.......Sorry, could not find valid secondary superblock
Exciting now.

I realize the magic number 0x00000000 is probably not a good thing and maybe
using fdisk to write a new table was not the way to do it?
Any suggestions on restoring the old partition table / magic number or how
to proceed? Is there an easy fix or is this a serious problem?

Kind Regards,
Chris

             reply	other threads:[~2007-12-10 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-10 21:33 Chris [this message]
2007-12-10 22:40 ` Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 Eric Sandeen
2007-12-11  0:41   ` AW: " Chris
2007-12-11  1:26     ` Eric Sandeen
2007-12-11  1:06   ` Chris
2007-12-11  2:12     ` Eric Sandeen
2007-12-10 22:55 ` Justin Piszcz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-12-11 12:47 Chris
2007-04-26 19:46 Martin Eisenhardt
2007-04-26 22:57 ` Nathan Scott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='002a01c83b74$52060330$f6120990$@de' \
    --to=hsvchris@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox