From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40044 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732409AbeGaRQ7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:16:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: remove COPYING from doc/ Makefile References: <20180731074313.GA19990@infradead.org> <20180731080646.GF2234@dastard> <20180731080825.GA16028@infradead.org> From: Eric Sandeen Message-ID: <00916b67-50bf-18b0-72b5-004f546659f0@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 10:36:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180731080825.GA16028@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner Cc: linux-xfs On 7/31/18 3:08 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 06:06:46PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: >> Sorry, what? I added that as part of my spdx conversion patch. That >> patch also removed the COPYING file. >> >> How did these changes get merged? I sent a pull request to convert >> everything in xfsprogs and that had all the correct conversions and >> documentation in it. here's the pull request: >> >> https://marc.info/?l=linux-xfs&m=152948738523911&w=2 >> >> and you can see from the diffstat it did all this stuff... > > Ok. I looked for license info in master but that didn't have the > whole conversion. That master vs for-next think in the userspace > tools keeps on confusing me.. > Sorry about that. I can rethink it if needed, when I started this gig I was keeping everything in rebaseable for-next because I feared egregious mistakes. That's still possible but I'd like to think I'm a little better at it now ;) -Eric