From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD85FC43217 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 01:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232382AbiKVBvq (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:51:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52654 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231661AbiKVBvo (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:51:44 -0500 Received: from out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.130]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 123FCE123B; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:51:41 -0800 (PST) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R211e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018045192;MF=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=16;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0VVPgoyJ_1669081895; Received: from 30.222.0.245(mailfrom:joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0VVPgoyJ_1669081895) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:51:37 +0800 Message-ID: <0c6a44ff-409e-99b2-eaa9-fd6e87a9e104@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:51:35 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH] filelock: move file locking definitions to separate header file Content-Language: en-US To: Jeff Layton , Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker Cc: hch@lst.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, devel@lists.orangefs.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org References: <20221120210004.381842-1-jlayton@kernel.org> From: Joseph Qi In-Reply-To: <20221120210004.381842-1-jlayton@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 11/21/22 4:59 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: > The file locking definitions have lived in fs.h since the dawn of time, > but they are only used by a small subset of the source files that > include it. > > Move the file locking definitions to a new header file, and add the > appropriate #include directives to the source files that need them. By > doing this we trim down fs.h a bit and limit the amount of rebuilding > that has to be done when we make changes to the file locking APIs. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton > --- > fs/9p/vfs_file.c | 1 + > fs/afs/internal.h | 1 + > fs/attr.c | 1 + > fs/ceph/locks.c | 1 + > fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 1 + > fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 1 + > fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 1 + > fs/cifs/file.c | 1 + > fs/cifs/smb2file.c | 1 + > fs/dlm/plock.c | 1 + > fs/fcntl.c | 1 + > fs/file_table.c | 1 + > fs/fuse/file.c | 1 + > fs/gfs2/file.c | 1 + > fs/inode.c | 1 + > fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 1 + > fs/ksmbd/vfs.c | 1 + > fs/ksmbd/vfs_cache.c | 1 + > fs/lockd/clntproc.c | 1 + > fs/lockd/netns.h | 1 + > fs/locks.c | 1 + > fs/namei.c | 1 + > fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h | 1 + > fs/nfs_common/grace.c | 1 + > fs/nfsd/netns.h | 1 + > fs/ocfs2/locks.c | 1 + > fs/ocfs2/stack_user.c | 1 + Seems it misses the related changes in: fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c Thanks, Joseph > fs/open.c | 1 + > fs/orangefs/file.c | 1 + > fs/proc/fd.c | 1 + > fs/utimes.c | 1 + > fs/xattr.c | 1 + > fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h | 1 + > fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 1 + > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 1 + > include/linux/filelock.h | 428 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/fs.h | 421 ------------------------------------- > include/linux/lockd/xdr.h | 1 + > 38 files changed, 464 insertions(+), 421 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 include/linux/filelock.h > > Unless anyone has objections, I'll plan to merge this in via the file > locking tree for v6.3. I'd appreciate Acked-bys or Reviewed-bys from > maintainers, however. >