From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:35:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kADGZWaG029179 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:35:33 -0800 Received: from houinet7.hou.moc.com (houinet7.hou.moc.com [192.70.218.25]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 9648A51B210 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:10:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: RHEL 4 Compatible Kernel Module Code From: "Stephen C. Rigler" Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-8t7RM/+IJRZy4HtfBske" Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:10:10 -0600 Message-Id: <1163434210.25484.14.camel@houuc8> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --=-8t7RM/+IJRZy4HtfBske Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings, We are using CentOS 4.4 along with the RHEL 4 compatible kernel modules (downloadable here: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4.4/centosplus/x86_64/RPMS/). According to the CentOS mailing list, the person at SGI who had been backporting the xfs code for RHEL4/CentOS4 has left the company. Are there any plans to continue this work? It seems like we are getting bit by this bug: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=410 but it doesn't look like the fix has been backported to the RHEL4 kernel module. Thanks, Steve --=-8t7RM/+IJRZy4HtfBske Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: Forwarded message - Re: [CentOS] Re: XFS Issues Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from pnors230.mgroupnet.com ([89.32.18.248]) by pnors220.mgroupnet.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:47:32 -0600 Received: from fdyinet2.fin.moc.com ([89.2.42.65]) by pnors230.mgroupnet.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:47:32 -0600 Received: from fdyinet2 ([65.219.124.100]) by fdyinet2.fin.moc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:47:29 -0500 Received: from plmler1.mail.eds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plmler1.mail.eds.com (8.13.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kA8Mkar7019397 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:46:36 -0600 Received: from plmler1.mail.eds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plmler1.mail.eds.com (8.13.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kA8Mj85J014819 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:45:08 -0600 Received: from mail.centos.org (mail.centos.org [72.21.40.12]) by plmler1.mail.eds.com (8.13.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kA8Mj88A014803 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:45:08 -0600 X-EDS-Source-Ip: 72.21.40.12 X-EDS-Source-Name: mail.centos.org X-EDS-Reported-Name: mail.centos.org Received: from lists.centos.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E317BF3C443; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 22:44:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: centos@centos.org Delivered-To: centos@centos.org Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mail.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D88F3C244 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 22:44:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n15so478150nfc for ; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:44:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Buu9Y3hRHhSe95zJw4sSTb3NpnVxBW/TY5VvHIluGSfodvFXuFCNV35rFHfgZV26jj9uBIAt2YnJifxqM7wSSHOwKCA5lUR3v5+TCThxPM5nA9pHB4V851BKIWMxBfYCzCSpzenaeRDuktyORajmEAzKGRvHbvUazbFZaJz3SPs= Received: by 10.49.3.10 with SMTP id f10mr2964749nfi.1163025889883; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:44:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.212.2 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:44:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 22:44:49 +0000 From: "James Pearson" To: "CentOS mailing list" Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: XFS Issues In-Reply-To: <1163013603.25393.23.camel@houuc8> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1163006260.25393.10.camel@houuc8> <1163013603.25393.23.camel@houuc8> X-Google-Sender-Auth: f30592bec6a19f7f X-BeenThere: centos@centos.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: CentOS mailing list List-Id: CentOS mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: centos-bounces@centos.org Errors-To: centos-bounces@centos.org X-Brightmail-Flag: NO X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on plmler1.mail.eds.com X-Spam-Report: This mail has been scanned in order to control spam. The results are given below in the "Content Analysis" line. If the number of points is greater than required, then this mail is very probably spam. ---------------- Content Analysis: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) ---------------- X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Envelope-Trace: plmler1.kA8Mj85J014819 X-Envelope-From: Return-Path: centos-bounces@centos.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2006 22:47:29.0293 (UTC) FILETIME=[DE920BD0:01C70387] On 08/11/06, Stephen C. Rigler wrote: > On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 11:06 -0800, Scott Silva wrote: > > > Is there any chance that the fix will make it into the centosplus > > > kernel-module-xfs? > > Why not try installing 2.6.9-42.0.3 and see if maybe it is fixed? > > > > I installed it on a different system and the modinfo for xfs still gives > the same information: > > description: SGI-XFS CVS-2004-10-17_05:00_UTC > > Has the module been updated since 2.6.9-34.0.1? The kernel-module-xfs code hasn't changed in a while - that date stamp is incorrect, but the code is more like a year old. Unfortunately, the person at SGI that packaged up the code in the XFS module for RHEL4/CentOS4 no longer works for SGI (I believe he now works for RedHat). So, I guess, unless someone else at SGI (or elsewhere) back ports the more recent XFS code to the RHEL4 kernel, you are out of luck ... Or you could use an up to date kernel.org kernel instead ... James Pearson _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos --=-8t7RM/+IJRZy4HtfBske--