From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 16 Nov 2006 23:47:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kAH7kuaG024458 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 23:46:58 -0800 Received: from page.mel.office.aconex.com (mail.aconex.com [150.101.159.26]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id CB118D1D702C for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 23:46:07 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches From: Nathan Scott Reply-To: nscott@aconex.com In-Reply-To: <52841.10.0.0.2.1163745285.squirrel@sandeen.net> References: <455CB54F.8080901@sandeen.net> <20061117023946.GN11034@melbourne.sgi.com> <20061117055521.GS11034@melbourne.sgi.com> <52841.10.0.0.2.1163745285.squirrel@sandeen.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:52:23 +1100 Message-Id: <1163746343.4695.152.camel@edge> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: sandeen@sandeen.net Cc: David Chinner , Timothy Shimmin , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 00:34 -0600, sandeen@sandeen.net wrote: > and really, now that this is out in the wild, maybe sb_features3 > instead of padding is appropriate, and check both for the attr2 > bit...? :( Thats not going to work, theres three or four other feature2 bits preceding attr2 as well. The "take a 32 bit systems fs to a 64 bit system" is relatively uncommon, so I suppose its just something we live with (as we did with the log recovery issues in that situation for several years). cheers. -- Nathan