From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 05 Dec 2006 15:07:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from page.mel.office.aconex.com (eth2333.vic.adsl.internode.on.net [150.101.159.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kB5N7PaG018926 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 15:07:28 -0800 Subject: Recent changes in xfsprogs From: Nathan Scott Reply-To: nscott@aconex.com Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:06:10 +1100 Message-Id: <1165359970.1281.51.camel@edge> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: bnaujok@sgi.com Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Yo Barry, xfsprogs/doc/CHANGES - Rename include/list.h to xfs_list.h so that other applications do not accidentally use it. What was the problem here? This doesnt sound like the right fix - there should be no applications outside of the XFS userspace that use libxfs.h - thats what is for (exactly this reason, preventing namespace collision, by reducing all the XFS internals being exposed). Also, there seems to be lots of checkin mail not making it out to oss.sgi.com (let alone review mail), making it difficult for people to keep up to date with changes (and keep distros, like Debian, uptodate) ... could y'all make some effort to keep us "on the outside" in the loop? Oh, noone is updating oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/{news,index}.html with recent changes either - seems like progress has come to a halt to those of us no longer in the secret cabal, anyway ;) ... just FYI. cheers. -- Nathan