From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:07:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (mail.app.aconex.com [203.89.192.138]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kB7M7haG001138 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 14:07:44 -0800 Subject: Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms From: Nathan Scott Reply-To: nscott@aconex.com In-Reply-To: <45788CD1.9010509@falconstor.com> References: <4560AB84.9060200@sandeen.net> <45784E71.4080605@falconstor.com> <457854CB.5030507@sandeen.net> <45787ED4.5070801@falconstor.com> <1165525906.30459.25.camel@edge> <45788927.4030207@falconstor.com> <1165527628.30459.31.camel@edge> <45788CD1.9010509@falconstor.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:06:45 +1100 Message-Id: <1165529205.30459.36.camel@edge> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: geir.myrestrand@falconstor.com Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, Eric Sandeen On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 16:51 -0500, Geir A. Myrestrand wrote: > Sorry Nathan, but I'm not sure I understand what you refer to with > "test out the latest" --are you referring to the kernel or XFS? Yes. :) Current mainline kernels, or CVS from oss.sgi.com would have this fix I'm thinking of. cheers. -- Nathan