From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:21:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (mail.app.aconex.com [203.89.192.138])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kBL6Laqw027025
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:21:37 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Return failure error if something fails in xfs_growfs
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@aconex.com>
Reply-To: nscott@aconex.com
In-Reply-To: <200612210609.RAA24334@larry.melbourne.sgi.com>
References: <200612210609.RAA24334@larry.melbourne.sgi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:21:27 +1100
Message-Id: <1166682087.5572.192.camel@edge>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: Barry Naujok <bnaujok@melbourne.sgi.com>
Cc: xfs-dev@corp.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com

On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 17:15 +1100, Barry Naujok wrote:
> ...

Makes sense & looks correct in xdiff. :)

cheers.

-- 
Nathan