From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:25:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (mail.app.aconex.com [203.89.192.138]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l0V4P7qw024014 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:25:08 -0800 Subject: Re: TAKE 959451 - From: Nathan Scott Reply-To: nscott@aconex.com In-Reply-To: <200701310412.l0V4Cusv14683285@clink.americas.sgi.com> References: <200701310412.l0V4Cusv14683285@clink.americas.sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:24:02 +1100 Message-Id: <1170217442.18017.306.camel@edge> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Madan Valluri Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi Madan, On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 22:12 -0600, Madan Valluri wrote: > xfs_repair - 031 QA failure with platform that don't use the uuid field > in the super block. You mean "uuid in the log", I think - all platforms would have it in the super block. > QA 033 failing due to root inode being put in lost+found Ahahahaa - now thats funny; you just made my day... ;) -- Nathan