From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (mail.app.aconex.com [203.89.192.138]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l2G55m6p016941 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:05:49 -0700 Subject: Re: xfsdump buglets From: Nathan Scott Reply-To: nscott@aconex.com In-Reply-To: <20070316134240k-ooizumi@rifu.bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp> References: <1174015536.5051.193.camel@edge> <20070316134240k-ooizumi@rifu.bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:05:42 +1100 Message-Id: <1174021542.5051.196.camel@edge> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Kouta Ooizumi Cc: peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 13:42 +0900, Kouta Ooizumi wrote: > Hi Nathan, > ... > > xfsdump: ERROR: -^@ argument missing > >because -p needs a numeric argument. > > > >The message should say -p argument missing. > ... > This bug has already been fixed. > See also http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00010.html Ah, great - thanks for that. Ever seen the second problem reported there before (the wierd absolute vs relative pathname thing)? cheers. -- Nathan