From: Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.30-06725: xfs_fsr: Assertion failed: ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5991
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:29:00 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <117412553.303831245630540511.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <175383275.303721245629906853.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
----- "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 03:04:24AM -0400, Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > I've seen this assertion before and if it's the problem I think it
> > is then it should be fixed with this patch:
> >
> > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00176.html
> >
> > It shouldn't be difficult to test this too - If you run about 1024
> > dd writers to separate 100MB files and then run xfs_bmap on each
> > file afterwards it should assert.
>
> Thas is in a filesystem not big enough to actually fit those files,
> right? Might be worth adding a testcase like this..
Smaller files might work too. The trick will be to get enough threads
flushing files at the same time that we exhaust the reserved space pool
(ie xfs_trans_reserve() returns ENOSPC even when the XFS_TRANS_RESERVE
flag is used).
>
> Alex, can you give that patch a try?
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-22 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <175383275.303721245629906853.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2009-06-22 0:29 ` Lachlan McIlroy [this message]
[not found] <941396568.292261245481145500.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2009-06-20 7:04 ` 2.6.30-06725: xfs_fsr: Assertion failed: ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5991 Lachlan McIlroy
2009-06-20 18:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-20 18:17 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-06-23 22:51 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-06-18 19:31 Alexander Beregalov
2009-06-18 20:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-18 22:04 ` Alexander Beregalov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=117412553.303831245630540511.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com \
--to=lmcilroy@redhat.com \
--cc=a.beregalov@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox