From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:50:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (mail.app.aconex.com [203.89.192.138]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l2RNoP6p011319 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:50:28 -0700 Subject: Re: changing xfs file system tunnings(sunit,swidth) after mkfs.xfs From: Nathan Scott Reply-To: nscott@aconex.com In-Reply-To: <5d96567b0703270004j72d89618xe27bbf3d5e44eea1@mail.gmail.com> References: <5d96567b0703261325m8f17b2eg55e04264fee4832a@mail.gmail.com> <1174947030.5051.586.camel@edge> <5d96567b0703270004j72d89618xe27bbf3d5e44eea1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:50:30 +1000 Message-Id: <1175039430.4645.14.camel@edge> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: "Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)" Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 09:04 +0200, Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote: > EST) > > > ahha... > but did you ever tried to set an sunit value bigger than the one > set during the mkfs.xfs ? I've not tried it, no - is that a trick question? :) cheers. -- Nathan