From: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@fs3.ph>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: ZFS, XFS, and EXT4 compared
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 23:07:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1188659243.4430.8.camel@auctoritas.fs3.ph> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1188513751.24970.109.camel@edge.yarra.acx>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1089 bytes --]
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 08:42 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Possibly. Far more importantly for XFS, there really needs to be some
> way for RAID drivers to say "even though I support write barriers, its
> not a good idea for filesystems to enable write barriers by default on
> me". Enabling write barriers everywhere, by default, seems to have a
> far worse impact than any mkfs/mount option tweaking.
On all my systems with software RAID or dm-crypt (or both), mounting XFS
gives me a message about barriers being disabled because the underlying
device doesn't support it. For good measure I disable write caching on
all my systems with either software RAID or dm-crypt (or both).
Am I reading the thread correctly that even with this message showing
up, I still need to mount with nobarrier explicitly to improve
performance?
I also think it would be nice to add something like a modern-day tuning
FAQ for XFS. I know there's a bit on the FAQ already but perhaps it
needs an update?
Thanks.
--
Federico Sevilla III
F S 3 Consulting Inc.
http://www.fs3.ph
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-02 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-30 6:16 ZFS, XFS, and EXT4 compared Jeffrey W. Baker
2007-08-30 6:25 ` [zfs-discuss] " Cyril Plisko
2007-08-30 6:27 ` mike
2007-08-30 7:07 ` Nathan Scott
2007-08-30 13:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-08-30 18:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-08-30 19:09 ` Jeffrey W. Baker
2007-08-30 19:14 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-08-30 22:42 ` Nathan Scott
2007-09-01 15:07 ` Federico Sevilla III [this message]
2007-09-02 23:00 ` Nathan Scott
2007-08-30 13:37 ` Jose R. Santos
2007-08-30 18:52 ` Jeffrey W. Baker
2007-08-30 19:53 ` Jose R. Santos
2007-08-30 18:33 ` [zfs-discuss] " Jim Mauro
2007-08-30 19:07 ` eric kustarz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1188659243.4430.8.camel@auctoritas.fs3.ph \
--to=jijo@fs3.ph \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox