* Re: Known prob: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low? [not found] ` <1200918448.6341.5.camel@lappy> @ 2008-01-21 16:26 ` Linda Walsh 2008-01-21 17:13 ` Peter Zijlstra 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Linda Walsh @ 2008-01-21 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: LKML, Linux-Xfs Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 17:17 -0800, Linda Walsh wrote: > >> On my x86_64 machine, I got the following message >> in log (kern = 2.6.23.14) >> >> Jan 16 04:08:38 Astara kernel: BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low! >> Jan 16 04:08:38 Astara kernel: turning off the locking correctness >> validator. >> >> Have no idea what caused it as I found the message on my console >> somewhat after the fact. The system had been up over 24 hours and >> is still running. System still seems 'fine' (been up 3 days now), >> so you can treat this as a "data point". >> > > Are you perhaps an XFS user? > > ---- Funny you should mention that... yes. However, there were no other messages that seem to indicate that the message had anything to do with XFS. Nice shot in the dark. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Known prob: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low? 2008-01-21 16:26 ` Known prob: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low? Linda Walsh @ 2008-01-21 17:13 ` Peter Zijlstra 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2008-01-21 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linda Walsh; +Cc: LKML, Linux-Xfs, Ingo Molnar On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 08:26 -0800, Linda Walsh wrote: > Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 17:17 -0800, Linda Walsh wrote: > > > >> On my x86_64 machine, I got the following message > >> in log (kern = 2.6.23.14) > >> > >> Jan 16 04:08:38 Astara kernel: BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low! > >> Jan 16 04:08:38 Astara kernel: turning off the locking correctness > >> validator. > >> > >> Have no idea what caused it as I found the message on my console > >> somewhat after the fact. The system had been up over 24 hours and > >> is still running. System still seems 'fine' (been up 3 days now), > >> so you can treat this as a "data point". > >> > > > > Are you perhaps an XFS user? > > > > > ---- > Funny you should mention that... yes. However, there were no > other messages that seem to indicate that the message had anything > to do with XFS. Nice shot in the dark. :-), know issue, I guess I'll up the MAX_LOCK_DEPTH for the next release. I looked at dynamically allocating that stuff, but that gets awfully painful. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-21 17:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <47914FA7.1000807@tlinx.org>
[not found] ` <1200918448.6341.5.camel@lappy>
2008-01-21 16:26 ` Known prob: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low? Linda Walsh
2008-01-21 17:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox