From: Nathan Scott <nscott@aconex.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc()
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:52:33 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1209426754.23166.160.camel@edge.scott.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4815A7A5.9040507@firstfloor.org>
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 12:32 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > and
> > its a side-effect of needing to do that (all the code
> > dealing with specifics of ondisk format is shared).
>
> But does that really need "STATIC"? Seems doubtful to me.
In userspace STATIC is defined to nothing, and the tools
(and/or libxfs) directly call into numerous functions that
are (really) static in the kernel.
cheers.
--
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-28 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200804261651.02078.vda.linux__2040.04651536724$1209223026$gmane$org@googlemail.com>
2008-04-26 20:02 ` [PATCH] xfs: reduce stack usage in xfs_bmap_btalloc() Andi Kleen
2008-04-26 20:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-26 20:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-26 20:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-28 0:06 ` Nathan Scott
2008-04-28 5:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-28 10:32 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-28 23:52 ` Nathan Scott [this message]
2008-04-26 14:51 Denys Vlasenko
2008-04-26 18:54 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-04-26 23:05 ` Denys Vlasenko
2008-04-26 20:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-26 23:45 ` Denys Vlasenko
2008-04-27 23:40 ` David Chinner
2008-04-27 23:57 ` Denys Vlasenko
2008-04-28 3:32 ` David Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1209426754.23166.160.camel@edge.scott.net.au \
--to=nscott@aconex.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox