From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com ([192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m5R3PgYL026291 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:25:42 -0700 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 6FEC81834AA6 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com (gateway-1237.mvista.com [63.81.120.158]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id F3wjuuzidnLXNQoX for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flush requirements From: Daniel Walker In-Reply-To: <20080627022407.GB7703@parisc-linux.org> References: <1214455277-6387-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1214455277-6387-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1214512405.21035.110.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080627022407.GB7703@parisc-linux.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:26:39 -0700 Message-Id: <1214537199.21035.179.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Dave Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 20:24 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > Then leave them as semaphores. Really. > Are you saying you want to keep semaphores? Cause I think that goes against the overall agenda that I've seen, which is complete semaphore removal .. If you have issues with the removal method then we could change that .. Daniel