From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n67KJuec171954 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:19:56 -0500 Received: from netezza.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 11B2934AF29 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netezza.com (mta.netezza.com [12.148.248.132]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id qWdMH5VVSE2QeaW9 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [2.6.27.25] assfail in xfs_attr_quiesce() during umount From: Paul Smith In-Reply-To: <20090707190643.GA32467@infradead.org> References: <20090707190643.GA32467@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:18:43 -0400 Message-Id: <1246997925.2984.1.camel@psmith-ubeta.netezza.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: paul@mad-scientist.net List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Linux XFS , david chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, christoph hellwig On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 15:06 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > It looks somehwat dangerous for me. For now I would just comment > out the assert or change it to a WARN_ON as in the newer kernels. Hah! :-). OK, that works for me. Thanks Christoph. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs