From: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
To: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Cc: bfields@fieldses.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] commit_metadata export operation replacing nfsd_sync_dir
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:23:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1265984620.3201.73.camel@doink1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100211220500.26466.24169.stgit@case>
Generally this looks like a good change, but I do have
some questions embedded below.
-Alex
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 16:05 -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> - Add commit_metadata export_operation to allow the underlying filesystem to
> decide how to sync parent and child inodes most efficiently.
>
> - Usage of nfsd_sync_dir and write_inode_now has been replaced with the
> commit_metadata function that takes a svc_fh and optional dentry for the child.
In the cases you pass the child dentry, you will now be syncing
things to disk in a slightly different way/order from before.
I think this way is actually much better, but I thought I'd ask
anyway: are you sure that it's OK to sync them at the same time,
rather than directory first, then child (or the other way around,
depending on the case)?
> - The commit_metadata function calls the commit_metadata export_op if it's
> there, or else falls back to sync_inode instead of fsync and write_inode_now
> because only metadata need be synched here.
>
> - nfsd4_sync_rec_dir now uses vfs_fsync so that commit_metadata can be static
>
> - Add a 'delay_commit' arg to nfsd_setattr so that callers of
> nfsd_create_setattr can commit parent and child together avoiding an extra
> sync.
I think this is a distinct enough change to warrant a separate patch
from the commit_metadata feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
. . .
> index 5a754f7..98fb98e 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c
> @@ -119,9 +119,7 @@ out_no_tfm:
> static void
> nfsd4_sync_rec_dir(void)
> {
> - mutex_lock(&rec_dir.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
> - nfsd_sync_dir(rec_dir.dentry);
> - mutex_unlock(&rec_dir.dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
> + vfs_fsync(NULL, rec_dir.dentry, 0);
Why do you no longer need to acquire the mutex here?
I see it gets acquired during the ->fsync() call
inside vfs_fsync_range(), but is there a reason
that it needed to be held during the filemap_write_and_wait()
(as is done in the nfsd_sync_dir() code) also?
. . .
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> index ed024d3..97474fb 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
. . .
> @@ -415,9 +449,8 @@ nfsd_setattr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, struct iattr *iap,
> }
> if (size_change)
> put_write_access(inode);
> - if (!err)
> - if (EX_ISSYNC(fhp->fh_export))
> - write_inode_now(inode, 1);
> + if (!err && !delay_commit)
> + err = nfserrno(commit_metadata(fhp, NULL));
Is this sufficient even if the size has changed?
> out:
> return err;
>
. . .
> @@ -1766,10 +1763,10 @@ nfsd_rename(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *ffhp, char *fname, int flen,
> goto out_dput_new;
>
> host_err = vfs_rename(fdir, odentry, tdir, ndentry);
> - if (!host_err && EX_ISSYNC(tfhp->fh_export)) {
> - host_err = nfsd_sync_dir(tdentry);
> + if (!host_err) {
> + host_err = commit_metadata(tfhp, NULL);
> if (!host_err)
> - host_err = nfsd_sync_dir(fdentry);
> + host_err = commit_metadata(ffhp, NULL);
It violates the spirit of the "parent" and "child"
nature of its arguments, but it might be nice to
commit both directories' metadata with the same
call here.
. . .
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-12 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-11 22:04 [PATCH 0/2] commit_metadata export operation v4 Ben Myers
2010-02-11 22:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] commit_metadata export operation replacing nfsd_sync_dir Ben Myers
2010-02-12 14:23 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2010-02-12 17:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-11 22:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs_export_operations.commit_metadata Ben Myers
2010-02-12 14:46 ` Alex Elder
2010-02-12 17:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-12 19:56 ` bpm
2010-02-12 20:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-02-12 20:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-12 20:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-17 20:05 [PATCH 0/2] commit_metadata export operation v6 Ben Myers
2010-02-17 20:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] commit_metadata export operation replacing nfsd_sync_dir Ben Myers
2010-02-16 21:04 [PATCH 0/2] commit_metadata export operation v5 Ben Myers
2010-02-16 21:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] commit_metadata export operation replacing nfsd_sync_dir Ben Myers
2010-02-16 22:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-11 19:26 [PATCH 0/2] commit_metadata export operation v3 Ben Myers
2010-02-11 19:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] commit_metadata export operation replacing nfsd_sync_dir Ben Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1265984620.3201.73.camel@doink1 \
--to=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox