From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o2BMfEGR194493 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:41:14 -0600 Received: from mail.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 41462141F783 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:42:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail14.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.99]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id sVi9Kiy1gmP6iGTO for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:42:46 -0800 (PST) From: Dave Chinner Subject: [PATCH 11/19] xfs: Avoid inodes in reclaim when flushing from inode cache Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:42:09 +1100 Message-Id: <1268347337-7160-12-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> In-Reply-To: <1268347337-7160-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> References: <1268347337-7160-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: stable@kernel.org Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com >>From 018027be90a6946e8cf3f9b17b5582384f7ed117 Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:51:46 +0000 The reclaim code will handle flushing of dirty inodes before reclaim occurs, so avoid them when determining whether an inode is a candidate for flushing to disk when walking the radix trees. This is based on a test patch from Christoph Hellwig. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Alex Elder --- fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c index 63c585e..a80371e 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c @@ -179,26 +179,31 @@ xfs_sync_inode_valid( struct xfs_perag *pag) { struct inode *inode = VFS_I(ip); + int error = EFSCORRUPTED; /* nothing to sync during shutdown */ - if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount)) { - read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock); - return EFSCORRUPTED; - } + if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount)) + goto out_unlock; - /* If we can't get a reference on the inode, it must be in reclaim. */ - if (!igrab(inode)) { - read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock); - return ENOENT; - } - read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock); + /* avoid new or reclaimable inodes. Leave for reclaim code to flush */ + error = ENOENT; + if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_INEW | XFS_IRECLAIMABLE | XFS_IRECLAIM)) + goto out_unlock; - if (is_bad_inode(inode) || xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_INEW)) { + /* If we can't grab the inode, it must on it's way to reclaim. */ + if (!igrab(inode)) + goto out_unlock; + + if (is_bad_inode(inode)) { IRELE(ip); - return ENOENT; + goto out_unlock; } - return 0; + /* inode is valid */ + error = 0; +out_unlock: + read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock); + return error; } STATIC int -- 1.6.5 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs