From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] fs/xfs/quota: Add missing mutex_unlock From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 12:57:32 -0500 Message-ID: <1275069452.2302.5.camel@doink> Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Julia Lawall Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 17:57 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > From: Julia Lawall > > Add a mutex_unlock missing on the error path. The use of this lock is > balanced elsewhere in the file. Looks good. I'll pull this one into the XFS tree. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder > The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) > > // > @@ > expression E1; > @@ > > * mutex_lock(E1,...); > <+... when != E1 > if (...) { > ... when != E1 > * return ...; > } > ...+> > * mutex_unlock(E1,...); > // > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall > > --- > The use of ENOMEM rather than -ENOMEM is also a bit odd. > > fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c b/fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c > index 38e7641..2d8b7bc 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c > @@ -249,8 +249,10 @@ xfs_qm_hold_quotafs_ref( > > if (!xfs_Gqm) { > xfs_Gqm = xfs_Gqm_init(); > - if (!xfs_Gqm) > + if (!xfs_Gqm) { > + mutex_unlock(&xfs_Gqm_lock); > return ENOMEM; > + } > } > > /* _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs