public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] xfstests: use stat not lstat when examining devices
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:26:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275676010.2317.53.camel@doink> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C093F22.1010006@sandeen.net>

On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 13:00 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> If you try running xfstests on lvm volumes which are symlinks,
> it'll fail to run several tests because our _require_scratch 
> framework ultimately uses lstat not stat, and does not think 
> the lvm device (which is usually a symlink to a dm-X device) 
> is a block device.  Sigh.
> 
> Just calling stat(1) with -L to follow the link should
> suffice.

I wonder whether we'll find stat(1) output ever varies
enough to affect this.

But otherwise this looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>

> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/common.rc b/common.rc
> index 6bf1e12..db18884 100644
> --- a/common.rc
> +++ b/common.rc
> @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ _is_block_dev()
>  	exit 1
>      fi
>  
> -    [ -b $1 ] && src/lstat64 $1 | $AWK_PROG '/Device type:/ { print $9 }'
> +    [ -b $1 ] && stat -L $1 | $AWK_PROG '/Device type:/ { print $9 }'
>  }
>  
>  # Do a command, log it to $seq.full, optionally test return status
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs



_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-04 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-04 15:27 [PATCH] xfstests: use stat not lstat when examining devices Eric Sandeen
2010-06-04 17:36 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2010-06-04 18:00   ` [PATCH V3] " Eric Sandeen
2010-06-04 18:26     ` Alex Elder [this message]
2010-06-08 16:06       ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1275676010.2317.53.camel@doink \
    --to=aelder@sgi.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox