From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o7IBa4fK110371 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:36:04 -0500 Received: from mail.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id C1F1615D51FF for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail12.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.97]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id t7nBkfkhGl0blfLw for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dastard (unverified [121.44.216.100]) by mail.internode.on.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id 35687654-1927428 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:06:30 +0930 (CST) Received: from disturbed ([192.168.1.9]) by dastard with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1OlgwW-0005Kb-UR for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:36:28 +1000 Received: from dave by disturbed with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OlgwS-0007nr-Tp for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:36:24 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: [PATCH 2/8] xfs: ensure we mark all inodes in a freed cluster XFS_ISTALE Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:36:13 +1000 Message-Id: <1282131379-29932-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> In-Reply-To: <1282131379-29932-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> References: <1282131379-29932-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com From: Dave Chinner Under heavy load parallel metadata loads (e.g. dbench), we can fail to mark all the inodes in a cluster being freed as XFS_ISTALE as we skip inodes we cannot get the XFS_ILOCK_EXCL or the flush lock on. When this happens and the inode cluster buffer has already been marked stale and freed, inode reclaim can try to write the inode out as it is dirty and not marked stale. This can result in writing th metadata to an freed extent, or in the case it has already been overwritten trigger a magic number check failure and return an EUCLEAN error such as: Filesystem "ram0": inode 0x442ba1 background reclaim flush failed with 117 Fix this by ensuring that we hoover up all in memory inodes in the cluster and mark them XFS_ISTALE when freeing the cluster. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner --- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c index 68415cb..34798f3 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c @@ -1914,6 +1914,11 @@ xfs_iunlink_remove( return 0; } +/* + * A big issue when freeing the inode cluster is is that we _cannot_ skip any + * inodes that are in memory - they all must be marked stale and attached to + * the cluster buffer. + */ STATIC void xfs_ifree_cluster( xfs_inode_t *free_ip, @@ -1945,8 +1950,6 @@ xfs_ifree_cluster( } for (j = 0; j < nbufs; j++, inum += ninodes) { - int found = 0; - blkno = XFS_AGB_TO_DADDR(mp, XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, inum), XFS_INO_TO_AGBNO(mp, inum)); @@ -1965,7 +1968,9 @@ xfs_ifree_cluster( /* * Walk the inodes already attached to the buffer and mark them * stale. These will all have the flush locks held, so an - * in-memory inode walk can't lock them. + * in-memory inode walk can't lock them. By marking them all + * stale first, we will not attempt to lock them in the loop + * below as the XFS_ISTALE flag will be set. */ lip = XFS_BUF_FSPRIVATE(bp, xfs_log_item_t *); while (lip) { @@ -1977,11 +1982,11 @@ xfs_ifree_cluster( &iip->ili_flush_lsn, &iip->ili_item.li_lsn); xfs_iflags_set(iip->ili_inode, XFS_ISTALE); - found++; } lip = lip->li_bio_list; } + /* * For each inode in memory attempt to add it to the inode * buffer and set it up for being staled on buffer IO @@ -1993,6 +1998,7 @@ xfs_ifree_cluster( * even trying to lock them. */ for (i = 0; i < ninodes; i++) { +retry: read_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock); ip = radix_tree_lookup(&pag->pag_ici_root, XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, (inum + i))); @@ -2003,38 +2009,36 @@ xfs_ifree_cluster( continue; } - /* don't try to lock/unlock the current inode */ + /* + * Don't try to lock/unlock the current inode, but we + * _cannot_ skip the other inodes that we did not find + * in the list attached to the buffer and are not + * already marked stale. If we can't lock it, back off + * and retry. + */ if (ip != free_ip && !xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) { read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock); - continue; + delay(1); + goto retry; } read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock); - if (!xfs_iflock_nowait(ip)) { - if (ip != free_ip) - xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL); - continue; - } - + xfs_iflock(ip); xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_ISTALE); - if (xfs_inode_clean(ip)) { - ASSERT(ip != free_ip); - xfs_ifunlock(ip); - xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL); - continue; - } + /* + * we don't need to attach clean inodes or those only + * with unlogged changes (which we throw away, anyway). + */ iip = ip->i_itemp; - if (!iip) { - /* inode with unlogged changes only */ + if (!iip || xfs_inode_clean(ip)) { ASSERT(ip != free_ip); ip->i_update_core = 0; xfs_ifunlock(ip); xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL); continue; } - found++; iip->ili_last_fields = iip->ili_format.ilf_fields; iip->ili_format.ilf_fields = 0; @@ -2049,8 +2053,7 @@ xfs_ifree_cluster( xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL); } - if (found) - xfs_trans_stale_inode_buf(tp, bp); + xfs_trans_stale_inode_buf(tp, bp); xfs_trans_binval(tp, bp); } -- 1.7.1 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs