From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o8EMSltk151063 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:28:47 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] xfs: use unhashed buffers for size checks From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: <1284461777-1496-13-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> References: <1284461777-1496-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1284461777-1496-13-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:29:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1284503356.9701.95.camel@doink> Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 20:56 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > When we are checking we can access the last block of each device, we > do not need to use cached buffers as they will be tossed away > immediately. Use uncached buffers for size checks so that all IO > prior to full in-memory structure initialisation does not use the > buffer cache. Looks good. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > --- _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs