From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o8NHcbEN138770 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:38:38 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] xfs: batch inode reclaim lookup From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: <1285137869-10310-14-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> References: <1285137869-10310-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1285137869-10310-14-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:39:29 -0500 Message-ID: <1285263569.1973.62.camel@doink> Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 16:44 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Batch and optimise the per-ag inode lookup for reclaim to minimise > scanning overhead. This involves gang lookups on the radix trees to > get multiple inodes during each tree walk, and tighter validation of > what inodes can be reclaimed without blocking befor we take any > locks. > > This is based on ideas suggested in a proof-of-concept patch > posted by Nick Piggin. Looks good. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs