From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o9AFBdKh044968 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:11:39 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Fix some file permission. From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: <20101010080502.GA6674@infradead.org> References: <4CAE483F.1020608@sgi.com> <1286660111.5392.6.camel@doink> <20101010015723.GM4681@dastard> <20101010080502.GA6674@infradead.org> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:12:26 -0500 Message-ID: <1286723546.6713.0.camel@doink> Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Alain Renaud , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 04:05 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:57:23PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > This looks good to me but I'd like a second opinion, > > > to make sure there's no reason any of these should > > > be non-executable. > > > > I don't think it matters. Consistency is good, though, and we've > > taken patches like this in the past. > > Yeah. Btw, I'm not sure git-am can apply the mode changes from a patch, > in the worst case you might have to do the chmod calls manually. > OK. I'll figure out how to apply it. Thanks. -Alex _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs