From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o9EEmwYp024132 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:48:58 -0500 Received: from cf--amer001e--3.americas.sgi.com (cf--amer001e--3.americas.sgi.com [137.38.100.5]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A108F8050 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [PATCH 00/11] xfstests: rework src/randholes.c From: Alex Elder Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:49:31 -0500 Message-ID: <1287067771.2362.202.camel@doink> Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Dave's recent "dynamic speculative EOF preallocation" changes caused test 008 to no longer produce the kinds of holes it was expecting to see, so it got me looking at the program it uses, "src/randholes.c". Since 008 is the only test using this program, it probably doesn't deserve the attention I gave it yesterday, but I've done the work so I might as well submit the series for review and get my changes in. The first patch in the series actually addresses two things that are bugs. The remaining 10 are just cleanup and refactoring changes. Other than two bug fix changes and one change in output when running in very-verbose mode, the patched code should be pretty much functionally identical to before. -Alex _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs