From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 08/16] xfs: convert pag_ici_lock to a spin lock
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:55:11 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289206519-18377-9-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289206519-18377-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
now that we are using RCU protection for the inode cache lookups,
the lock is only needed on the modification side. Hence it is not
necessary for the lock to be a rwlock as there are no read side
holders anymore. Convert it to a spin lock to reflect it's exclusive
nature.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
---
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c | 14 +++++++-------
fs/xfs/xfs_ag.h | 2 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_iget.c | 10 +++++-----
fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
index 9a53cc9..0b3d367 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
@@ -596,12 +596,12 @@ xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(
struct xfs_perag *pag;
pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, XFS_INO_TO_AGNO(mp, ip->i_ino));
- write_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+ spin_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
__xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(pag, ip);
__xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE);
spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
- write_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
xfs_perag_put(pag);
}
@@ -802,12 +802,12 @@ reclaim:
* added to the tree assert that it's been there before to catch
* problems with the inode life time early on.
*/
- write_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+ spin_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
if (!radix_tree_delete(&pag->pag_ici_root,
XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(ip->i_mount, ip->i_ino)))
ASSERT(0);
__xfs_inode_clear_reclaim(pag, ip);
- write_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
/*
* Here we do an (almost) spurious inode lock in order to coordinate
@@ -871,14 +871,14 @@ restart:
struct xfs_inode *batch[XFS_LOOKUP_BATCH];
int i;
- write_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+ spin_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
nr_found = radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag(
&pag->pag_ici_root,
(void **)batch, first_index,
XFS_LOOKUP_BATCH,
XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
if (!nr_found) {
- write_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
break;
}
@@ -905,7 +905,7 @@ restart:
}
/* unlock now we've grabbed the inodes. */
- write_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
for (i = 0; i < nr_found; i++) {
if (!batch[i])
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ag.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_ag.h
index 63c7a1a..58632cc 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ag.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ag.h
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_perag {
atomic_t pagf_fstrms; /* # of filestreams active in this AG */
- rwlock_t pag_ici_lock; /* incore inode lock */
+ spinlock_t pag_ici_lock; /* incore inode cache lock */
struct radix_tree_root pag_ici_root; /* incore inode cache root */
int pag_ici_reclaimable; /* reclaimable inodes */
struct mutex pag_ici_reclaim_lock; /* serialisation point */
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iget.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iget.c
index edeb918..e00d88c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iget.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iget.c
@@ -237,14 +237,14 @@ xfs_iget_cache_hit(
goto out_error;
}
- write_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+ spin_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
ip->i_flags &= ~(XFS_IRECLAIMABLE | XFS_IRECLAIM);
ip->i_flags |= XFS_INEW;
__xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(mp, pag, ip);
inode->i_state = I_NEW;
spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
- write_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
} else {
/* If the VFS inode is being torn down, pause and try again. */
if (!igrab(inode)) {
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ xfs_iget_cache_miss(
BUG();
}
- write_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+ spin_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
/* insert the new inode */
error = radix_tree_insert(&pag->pag_ici_root, agino, ip);
@@ -337,14 +337,14 @@ xfs_iget_cache_miss(
ip->i_udquot = ip->i_gdquot = NULL;
xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_INEW);
- write_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
radix_tree_preload_end();
*ipp = ip;
return 0;
out_preload_end:
- write_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
radix_tree_preload_end();
if (lock_flags)
xfs_iunlock(ip, lock_flags);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
index 0d9a030..7544258 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
@@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ xfs_initialize_perag(
goto out_unwind;
pag->pag_agno = index;
pag->pag_mount = mp;
- rwlock_init(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
mutex_init(&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock);
INIT_RADIX_TREE(&pag->pag_ici_root, GFP_ATOMIC);
spin_lock_init(&pag->pag_buf_lock);
--
1.7.2.3
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-08 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-08 8:55 [PATCH 00/16] xfs: current patch stack for 2.6.38 window Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 01/16] xfs: fix per-ag reference counting in inode reclaim tree walking Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 9:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 02/16] xfs: move delayed write buffer trace Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 9:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 03/16] [RFC] xfs: use generic per-cpu counter infrastructure Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 12:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-09 0:20 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 04/16] xfs: dynamic speculative EOF preallocation Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 11:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-09 0:08 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 05/16] xfs: don't truncate prealloc from frequently accessed inodes Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 11:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 23:56 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 06/16] patch xfs-inode-hash-fake Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 9:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 07/16] xfs: convert inode cache lookups to use RCU locking Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 23:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-09 0:24 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-09 3:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-09 5:04 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-10 5:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-10 6:20 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-11-08 23:10 ` [PATCH 08/16] xfs: convert pag_ici_lock to a spin lock Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 09/16] xfs: convert xfsbud shrinker to a per-buftarg shrinker Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 10/16] xfs: add a lru to the XFS buffer cache Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 23:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 23:45 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 11/16] xfs: connect up buffer reclaim priority hooks Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 11:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 23:50 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 12/16] xfs: bulk AIL insertion during transaction commit Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 13/16] xfs: reduce the number of AIL push wakeups Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 11:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 23:51 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 14/16] xfs: remove all the inodes on a buffer from the AIL in bulk Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 15/16] xfs: only run xfs_error_test if error injection is active Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 11:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 16/16] xfs: make xlog_space_left() independent of the grant lock Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 14:17 ` [PATCH 00/16] xfs: current patch stack for 2.6.38 window Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-09 0:21 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289206519-18377-9-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox