[PATCH] Xfstest 245: accept ENOTEMPTY as a valid error for the test

[Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>]

Testt 245 only checks to see if the rename returned EEXIST, but according to the
rename(2) manpage, ENOTEMPTY is also a valid result, which is in fact what Btrfs
returns.  So just filter the output for ENOTEMPTY so that either EEXIST or
ENOTEMPTY will pass the test.  It's not pretty I know, but I couldn't really
figure out a good way to get an either/or output to compare.  With this fix
Btrfs now passes 245.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
---
 245 |   10 +++++++++-
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 mode change 100644 => 100755 245

diff --git a/245 b/245
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
index 9c1cd3a..02b3173
--- a/245
+++ b/245
@@ -48,6 +48,14 @@ _cleanup()
 	rm -rf $dir
 }
 
+# According to the rename(2) manpage you can get either EEXIST or ENOTEMPTY as an
+# error for trying to rename a non-empty directory, so just catch the error for
+# ENOTMEMPTY and replace it with the EEXIST output so that either result passes
+_filter_directory_not_empty()
+{
+	sed -e "s,Directory not empty,File exists,g"
+}
+ 
 trap "_cleanup ; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
 
 
@@ -59,7 +67,7 @@ touch $dir/aa/1
 mkdir $dir/ab/aa
 touch $dir/ab/aa/2
 
-mv $dir/ab/aa/ $dir 2>&1 | _filter_test_dir
+mv $dir/ab/aa/ $dir 2>&1 | _filter_test_dir | _filter_directory_not_empty
 
 status=0
 exit $status
-- 
1.6.6.1

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs