From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p0AKKV1u038486 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:20:31 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] xfsprogs: some things aren't all that special From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: <20110110201137.GA27277@infradead.org> References: <1293741599.2294.342.camel@doink> <20110110201137.GA27277@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:22:36 -0600 Message-ID: <1294690956.5374.48.camel@doink> Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 15:11 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Also you've stopped overwriting orphanage_ino if it already exists. Actually, I had noticed I did more (or worse) than just that. Once orphanage_ino has been saved, my change no longer says it should avoid obfuscating it. (Or is that what you mean by "overwriting"?) Anyway, I noticed that problem the other day and thought I'd fix it if I had a chance to re-post. Thanks. -Alex _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs