From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p19GNF3J006444 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:23:16 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Add test 249: Check filesystem FITRIM implementation From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: References: <1296762207-17265-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> <1297167619.7351.29.camel@doink> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 10:24:00 -0600 Message-ID: <1297268640.2513.0.camel@doink> Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Lukas Czerner Cc: hch@infradead.org, esandeen@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 13:13 +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > One more thing though. Where did you get the number 252 ? This patch > still apply cleanly on the top of the master branch. I am using this > repo: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git > > Shall I use a different one ? Which one is the most up-to-date ? Like I said, use what works for you, and when the time comes to commit it I will update all the numbers for you to match what's current. I've been testing with some other tests not yet committed. -Alex _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs