From: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: validate inode di_flaaags field
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:45:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1298407556.1960.54.camel@doink> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1298407419.1960.48.camel@doink>
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 14:43 -0600, Alex Elder wrote:
> (I may have missed it, but I don't believe Dave posted
> this patch so I'm doing it for him to get it on the
> list. -Alex)
>
> xfs-reapir is not validating the di_flags field in the inode for
> sanity. Block fuzzing indicates that we are not picking situations
> like the RT bit being set on filesystems without realtime devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
I guess I should have left it up to Dave...
repair/dinode.c | 62
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/repair/dinode.c b/repair/dinode.c
index bf04c6e..fad15b2 100644
--- a/repair/dinode.c
+++ b/repair/dinode.c
@@ -2530,6 +2530,68 @@ process_dinode_int(xfs_mount_t *mp,
goto clear_bad_out;
}
+ /*
+ * check that we only have valid flags set, and those that are
set make
+ * sense.
+ */
+ if (dinoc->di_flags) {
+ uint16_t flags = be16_to_cpu(dinoc->di_flags);
+
+ if (flags & ~XFS_DIFLAG_ANY) {
+ do_warn(_("Bad flags set in inode %llu"), lino);
+ flags &= ~XFS_DIFLAG_ANY;
+ }
+
+ if (flags & (XFS_DIFLAG_REALTIME |
XFS_DIFLAG_RTINHERIT)) {
+ /* need an rt-dev! */
+ if (!rt_name) {
+ do_warn(_(
+ "inode %llu has RT flag set but there is no RT device"), lino);
+ flags &= ~(XFS_DIFLAG_REALTIME |
+ XFS_DIFLAG_RTINHERIT);
+ }
+ }
+ if (flags & XFS_DIFLAG_NEWRTBM_BIT) {
+ /* must be a rt bitmap inode */
+ if (lino != mp->m_sb.sb_rbmino) {
+ do_warn(_("inode %llu not rt bitmap"),
lino);
+ flags &= ~XFS_DIFLAG_NEWRTBM_BIT;
+ }
+ }
+ if (flags & (XFS_DIFLAG_RTINHERIT |
+ XFS_DIFLAG_EXTSZINHERIT |
+ XFS_DIFLAG_PROJINHERIT |
+ XFS_DIFLAG_NOSYMLINKS)) {
+ /* must be a directory */
+ if (di_mode && !S_ISDIR(di_mode)) {
+ do_warn(_(
+ "directory flags set on non-directory inode %
llu"),
+ lino);
+ flags &= ~(XFS_DIFLAG_RTINHERIT |
+ XFS_DIFLAG_EXTSZINHERIT
|
+ XFS_DIFLAG_PROJINHERIT |
+ XFS_DIFLAG_NOSYMLINKS);
+ }
+ }
+ if (flags & (XFS_DIFLAG_REALTIME | XFS_XFLAG_EXTSIZE)) {
+ /* must be a file */
+ if (di_mode && !S_ISREG(di_mode)) {
+ do_warn(_(
+ "file flags set on non-file inode %llu"), lino);
+ flags &= ~(XFS_DIFLAG_REALTIME |
+ XFS_XFLAG_EXTSIZE);
+ }
+ }
+ if (!verify_mode && flags !=
be16_to_cpu(dinoc->di_flags)) {
+ if (!no_modify) {
+ do_warn(_(", fixing bad flags.\n"));
+ dinoc->di_flags = cpu_to_be16(flags);
+ *dirty = 1;
+ } else
+ do_warn(_(", would fix bad flags.\n"));
+ }
+ }
+
if (verify_mode)
return retval;
--
1.7.4
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-22 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-22 20:43 [PATCH] xfs_repair: validate inode di_flaaags field Alex Elder
2011-02-22 20:45 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2011-02-22 21:39 ` Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1298407556.1960.54.camel@doink \
--to=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox