From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p1NMTPim087581 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:29:25 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: inode flags check should use flags From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: <1298500151-27017-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> References: <1298500151-27017-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:31:46 -0600 Message-ID: <1298500306.2453.28.camel@doink> Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 09:29 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > The RT bitmap inode format flag check should use the flag, not the > bit definition. As a result, it is incorrectly detecting inodes with > the prealloc flag set as has having an invalid bit set. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Looks good. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs