public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] xfs: xfs_trans_read_buf() should return an error on failure
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:01:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1301086861.2537.682.camel@doink> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300860870-15471-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 17:14 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> When inside a transaction and we fail to read a buffer,
> xfs_trans_read_buf returns a null buffer pointer and no error.
> xfs_do_da_buf() checks the error return, but not the buffer, and as
> a result this read failure condition causes a panic when it attempts
> to dereference the non-existant buffer.
> 
> Make xfs_trans_read_buf() return the same error for this situation
> regardless of whether it is in a transaction or not. This means
> every caller does not need to check both the error return and the
> buffer before proceeding to use the buffer.

Good idea.  Later we can clean up callers.  I see that not
all callers currently check for a null buffer return...

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>

> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c |    3 ++-

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-25 20:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-23  6:14 xfs: outstanding patches for 2.6.39 Dave Chinner
2011-03-23  6:14 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: preallocation transactions do not need to be synchronous Dave Chinner
2011-03-24 17:18   ` brian.foster
2011-03-24 22:53     ` [PATCH V2] " Dave Chinner
2011-03-25 21:00   ` [PATCH 1/6] " Alex Elder
2011-03-25 22:02     ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-23  6:14 ` [PATCH 2/6] vmap: flush vmap aliases when mapping fails Dave Chinner
2011-03-25 21:00   ` Alex Elder
2011-03-23  6:14 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: introduce inode cluster buffer trylocks for xfs_iflush Dave Chinner
2011-03-25 21:00   ` Alex Elder
2011-03-23  6:14 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: xfs_trans_read_buf() should return an error on failure Dave Chinner
2011-03-23 11:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-25 21:01   ` Alex Elder [this message]
2011-03-23  6:14 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: register the inode cache shrinker before quotachecks Dave Chinner
2011-03-23 21:24   ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2011-03-25 12:56     ` Michael Weissenbacher
2011-03-25 23:08       ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-25 21:01   ` Alex Elder
2011-03-23  6:14 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: stop using the page cache to back the buffer cache Dave Chinner
2011-03-25 21:02   ` Alex Elder
2011-03-25 22:04     ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-23  7:01 ` xfs: outstanding patches for 2.6.39 Andi Kleen
2011-03-23 11:38   ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-23 16:05     ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-23 22:48       ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-23 11:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-23 11:38   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1301086861.2537.682.camel@doink \
    --to=aelder@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox