public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH, v2] xfs: cleanup duplicate initializations
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:03:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1302732208.2023.146.camel@doink> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1301338370.2622.10.camel@doink>

On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 13:52 -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 19:12 +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > follow these guidelines:
> > - leave initialization in the declaration block if it fits the line
> > - move to the code where it's more suitable ('for' init block)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
> 
> Looks good.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>

I retract this.  The last chunk in the patch is erroneous.

Below is the original proposed patch, except I have
modified the last chunk to be a correct fix for what
appears to be a duplicate initialization.  (It was not,
really, but I've changed it so only one assignment is
made, and the result makes it more obvious what's
going on.)

David, perhaps you could sign off on this version.
Meanwhile, another reviewer might make sense.

					-Alex

follow these guidelines:
- leave initialization in the declaration block if it fits the line
- move to the code where it's more suitable ('for' init block)

Originally proposed by David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>

Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>

---
 fs/xfs/xfs_dfrag.c      |    6 +-----
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c |    1 -
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c      |    4 ++--
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: b/fs/xfs/xfs_dfrag.c
===================================================================
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_dfrag.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_dfrag.c
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
        xfs_inode_t     *tip,   /* tmp inode */
        xfs_swapext_t   *sxp)
 {
-       xfs_mount_t     *mp;
+       xfs_mount_t     *mp = ip->i_mount;
        xfs_trans_t     *tp;
        xfs_bstat_t     *sbp = &sxp->sx_stat;
        xfs_ifork_t     *tempifp, *ifp, *tifp;
@@ -212,16 +212,12 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
        int             taforkblks = 0;
        __uint64_t      tmp;
 
-       mp = ip->i_mount;
-
        tempifp = kmem_alloc(sizeof(xfs_ifork_t), KM_MAYFAIL);
        if (!tempifp) {
                error = XFS_ERROR(ENOMEM);
                goto out;
        }
 
-       sbp = &sxp->sx_stat;
-
        /*
         * we have to do two separate lock calls here to keep lockdep
         * happy. If we try to get all the locks in one call, lock will
Index: b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c
===================================================================
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c
@@ -970,7 +970,6 @@ xfs_iflush_abort(
 {
        xfs_inode_log_item_t    *iip = ip->i_itemp;
 
-       iip = ip->i_itemp;
        if (iip) {
                struct xfs_ail  *ailp = iip->ili_item.li_ailp;
                if (iip->ili_item.li_flags & XFS_LI_IN_AIL) {
Index: b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
===================================================================
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
@@ -1900,7 +1900,7 @@ xfs_mod_incore_sb_batch(
        uint                    nmsb,
        int                     rsvd)
 {
-       xfs_mod_sb_t            *msbp = &msb[0];
+       xfs_mod_sb_t            *msbp;
        int                     error = 0;
 
        /*
@@ -1910,7 +1910,7 @@ xfs_mod_incore_sb_batch(
         * changes will be atomic.
         */
        spin_lock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
-       for (msbp = &msbp[0]; msbp < (msb + nmsb); msbp++) {
+       for (msbp = msb; msbp < (msb + nmsb); msbp++) {
                ASSERT(msbp->msb_field < XFS_SBS_ICOUNT ||
                       msbp->msb_field > XFS_SBS_FDBLOCKS);
 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-13 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-28 17:12 [PATCH] xfs: cleanup duplicate initializations David Sterba
2011-03-28 18:52 ` Alex Elder
2011-04-13 22:03   ` Alex Elder [this message]
2011-04-13 22:53     ` [PATCH, v2] " Dave Chinner
2011-04-14 14:50       ` Alex Elder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1302732208.2023.146.camel@doink \
    --to=aelder@sgi.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox