From: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfs: exact busy extent tracking
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:08:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303416500.2581.519.camel@doink> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110418070043.915023373@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 02:59 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Update the extent tree in case we have to reuse a busy extent, so that it
> always is kept uptodate. This is done by replacing the busy list searches
> with a new xfs_alloc_busy_reuse helper, which updates the busy extent tree
> in case of a reuse. This allows us to allow reusing metadata extents
> unconditionally, and thus avoid log forces especially for allocation btree
> blocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
I think you finally got it Christoph.
I have one question--which I may have mentioned before--but
otherwise this looks good. I think the iterations have
resulted in a better result.
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
. . .
In xfs_alloc_busy_trim():
> @@ -2894,6 +2959,11 @@ fail:
> * re-check if the trimmed extent satisfies the minlen requirement.
> */
> spin_unlock(&args->pag->pagb_lock);
> + if (fbno != bno || flen != len) {
> + trace_xfs_alloc_busy_trim(args->mp, args->agno, bno, len,
> + fbno, flen);
> + }
> + trace_xfs_alloc_busy_trim(args->mp, args->agno, bno, len, fbno, 0);
> *rbno = fbno;
> *rlen = 0;
> }
I don't see why you do two trace calls here, the second
with 0 for the value of flen.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-21 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-18 6:59 [PATCH 0/4] improved busy extent handling V4 Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-18 6:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: optimize AGFL refills Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-18 6:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: do not immediately reuse busy extent ranges Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-18 6:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: exact busy extent tracking Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-21 20:08 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2011-04-22 4:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-18 6:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: reduce the number of pagb_lock roundtrips in xfs_alloc_clear_busy Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-24 19:06 [PATCH 0/4] improved busy extent handling V5 Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-24 19:06 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: exact busy extent tracking Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-29 1:10 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1303416500.2581.519.camel@doink \
--to=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox