From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p44EoZFs080079 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 09:50:35 -0500 Received: from mail.perches.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 7E7F042E5FF for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 07:54:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.perches.com (mail.perches.com [173.55.12.10]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id U6iNpGykaJDEV28t for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 07:54:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill off xfs_printk() From: Joe Perches In-Reply-To: <1304519398.2841.12.camel@doink> References: <20110504004453.GC9114@dastard> <1304519398.2841.12.camel@doink> Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 07:54:11 -0700 Message-ID: <1304520851.1788.96.camel@Joe-Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: aelder@sgi.com Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 09:29 -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > Honestly I wasn't sure about that. Since I changed it I > kind of hoped he'd acknowledge or sign off on it. I guess > I'm still learning about the conventions for signing off > on things. I want to give all credit properly, I just > don't always know the Right Way to do so. When I modify a patch to my taste I use Original-patch-by: Anyway, no worries to me, whatever you want. Acked-by: Joe Perches Signed-off-by: Joe Perches Original-patch-by: Joe Perches cheers, Joe _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs