From: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] xfs: remove the unused XFS_BMAPI_RSVBLOCKS flag
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 15:17:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305922660.1964.57.camel@doink> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110511150711.367977044@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 11:04 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> plain text document attachment (xfs-kill-XFS_BMAPI_RSVBLOCKS)
> The XFS_BMAPI_RSVBLOCKS is unused, and as far as I can see has always been.
> Remove it to simplify the bmapi implementation and conserve stack space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-20 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-11 15:04 [PATCH 0/9] extent buffer indexing fixes Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: remove the unused XFS_BMAPI_RSVBLOCKS flag Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-20 20:17 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: remove if_lastex Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-20 20:17 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-23 8:52 ` [PATCH 2/9 v2] " Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-25 1:14 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: correctly decrement the extent buffer index in xfs_bmap_del_extent Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-12 6:50 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-12 6:54 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-12 7:17 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-25 0:27 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: do not use unchecked extent indices in xfs_bmap_add_extent_* Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-12 7:31 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-25 0:30 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: do not use unchecked extent indices in xfs_bmapi Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-12 7:20 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-25 0:31 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: do not use unchecked extent indices in xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-12 7:22 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-25 0:31 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: do not do pointer arithmetics on extent records Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-12 7:23 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-25 0:31 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: fix up asserts in xfs_iflush_fork Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-12 7:24 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-25 0:32 ` Alex Elder
2011-05-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: check for valid indices in xfs_iext_get_ext and xfs_iext_idx_to_irec Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-12 7:26 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2011-05-25 0:32 ` Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1305922660.1964.57.camel@doink \
--to=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox