From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p4P0X9oW106059 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:33:10 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: do not use unchecked extent indices in xfs_bmapi From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: <20110511150712.222802741@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20110511150402.258164661@bombadil.infradead.org> <20110511150712.222802741@bombadil.infradead.org> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 19:31:29 -0500 Message-ID: <1306283489.2823.94.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 11:04 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > plain text document attachment (xfs-fix-ep-access-2) > Make sure to only call xfs_iext_get_ext after we've validate the extent index > when moving on to the next index in xfs_bmapi. > > Based on an earlier patch from Lachlan McIlroy. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Looks good. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs