From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p5GLf6H6063460 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:41:06 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH]: [xfstests] Change test 202 to create a filesystem with small enough filesystem for a single AG From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: <1307981905.7661.461.camel@chandra-lucid.beaverton.ibm.com> References: <1307981905.7661.461.camel@chandra-lucid.beaverton.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:41:02 -0500 Message-ID: <1308260462.2717.33.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: sekharan@us.ibm.com Cc: Eric Sandeen , XFS Mailing List On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 09:18 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > Test 202 fails when the filesystem size is greater than 1TB with > not so clear message. > > Call mkfs with a small enough filesystem size even with older > versions of XFS. > > Signed-Off-By: Chandra Seetharaman Looks good. I will commit this for you. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs