From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p66E5SFj126834 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:05:28 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/27] xfs: split xfs_itruncate_finish From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: <20110706081138.GA5361@infradead.org> References: <20110701094321.936534538@bombadil.infradead.org> <20110701094603.580931463@bombadil.infradead.org> <1309926958.3381.61.camel@doink> <20110706081138.GA5361@infradead.org> Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:05:24 -0500 Message-ID: <1309961124.1931.13.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 04:11 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 11:35:58PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > > The above comment (if true--I haven't really checked) seems > > like something significant to preserve. > > The comment at the goto label already catches the important bits of it. I was referring to this: Aborting from this point might lose some blocks in the file system, but oh well. I don't actually understand what the comment means, but if you feel it isn't important that's fine. -Alex _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs