From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p6MCvRUs084655 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:57:27 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8BFE28DB7A for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 05:57:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9EchyJVhI1AmIfhu for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 05:57:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] mm: vmscan: Do not writeback filesystem pages from kswapd From: Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <1311265730-5324-9-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> References: <1311265730-5324-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1311265730-5324-9-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:57:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1311339432.27400.36.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mel Gorman Cc: Rik van Riel , Jan Kara , LKML , XFS , Christoph Hellwig , Linux-MM , Minchan Kim , Wu Fengguang , Johannes Weiner On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 17:28 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > Assuming that flusher threads will always write back dirty pages promptly > then it is always faster for reclaimers to wait for flushers. This patch > prevents kswapd writing back any filesystem pages. That is a somewhat sort changelog for such a big assumption ;-) I think it can use a few extra words to explain the need to clean pages from @zone vs writeback picks whatever fits best on disk and how that works out wrt the assumption. What requirements does this place on writeback and how does it meet them. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs