public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: flag all buffers as metadata
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:41:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311720097.11557.16.camel@doink> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110726224016.GA10394@infradead.org>

On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 18:40 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:38:55PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:06 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: 
> > > Now that REQ_META bios aren't treated specially in the CFQ I/O schedule
> > > anymore, we can tag all buffers as metadata to make blktrace traces more
> > > meaningful.  Note that we use buffers also to zero out partial blocks
> > > in the preallocation / hole punching code, and while they operate on
> > > data blocks the zeros written certainly aren't data.  I think this case
> > > is borderline metadata enough to not bother special casing it.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > 
> > This looks good.  I plan to re-base the xfs master branch
> > after 3.1-rc1 is out, so I'll wait until after that to
> > commit this (and the others in this series).
> 
> I'd prefer to get it out to Linus ASAP after some review.  Just
> committing it to for-linus for now and later rebasing master on top
> should do fine for that.

OK, fine with me.  I'll get that process started this evening.

					-Alex

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-26 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20110726150633.GA17400@infradead.org>
2011-07-26 15:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: flag all buffers as metadata Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 22:38   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-26 22:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 22:41       ` Alex Elder [this message]
2011-07-26 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: prevent against ioend livelocks in xfs_file_fsync Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 22:39   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-26 15:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: optimize the negative xattr caching Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 22:39   ` Alex Elder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1311720097.11557.16.camel@doink \
    --to=aelder@sgi.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox