From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p7PDJrTs202495 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:19:53 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfsprogs: xfs_quota: a few fixes From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: <20110825045823.GA23901@infradead.org> References: <1314222823-24101-1-git-send-email-aelder@sgi.com> <20110825045823.GA23901@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:19:49 -0500 Message-ID: <1314278389.3136.1.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 00:58 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:53:40PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > > The main problem solved in this series is that for project > > quotas, the numbers of blocks reported by the xfs_quota "df" > > subcommand is twice what it should be. While looking at > > this I also noticed two other problems that I corrected. > > > > Below is a script that demonstrates the problem. > > This script should be turned into an xfsqa testcase. > I knew someone would say that (but was hoping I would not hear it)... I will do it. -Alex _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs