From: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] xfs: wait for I/O completion when writing out pages in xfs_setattr_size
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:22:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1314904972.2903.69.camel@doink> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110823082913.640125155@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 04:28 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The current code relies on the xfs_ioend_wait call later on to make sure
> all I/O actually has completed. The xfs_ioend_wait call will go away soon,
> so prepare for that by using the waiting filemap function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-01 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-23 8:28 [PATCH 00/11] patch queue for Linux 3.2 Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: remove delwri buffer handling from xfs_buf_iorequest Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:21 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: remove the unlock argument to xfs_buf_delwri_queue Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-09-01 21:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: move more delwri setup into xfs_buf_delwri_queue Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: call xfs_buf_delwri_queue directly Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-09-01 21:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-02 0:17 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: let xfs_bwrite callers handle the xfs_buf_relse Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: use the "delwri" terminology consistently Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: remove dead ENODEV handling in xfs_destroy_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: defer AIO/DIO completions Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-24 0:01 ` Dave Chinner
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: reduce ioend latency Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: wait for I/O completion when writing out pages in xfs_setattr_size Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: remove i_iocount Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1314904972.2903.69.camel@doink \
--to=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox