From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p89NwTUr066686 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:58:29 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/25] xfs: pass bmalloca to xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: <20110824060645.290805402@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20110824060428.789245205@bombadil.infradead.org> <20110824060645.290805402@bombadil.infradead.org> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:56:31 -0500 Message-ID: <1315612591.1999.138.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 02:04 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > All the parameters passed to xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real() are in the > xfs_bmalloca structure now. Just pass the bmalloca parameter to the > function instead of 8 separate parameters. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Looks good. Maybe xfs_bmalloca field "got" could be renamed but I can't think of a good one. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs