From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p8KK4ZKZ080771 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:04:35 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mkfs.xfs: don't increase agblocks past maximum From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: <4E78F184.2050404@redhat.com> References: <4E77B7E2.6020805@redhat.com> <1316548828.2912.48.camel@doink> <4E78F184.2050404@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:04:31 -0500 Message-ID: <1316549071.2912.49.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Boris Ranto , xfs-oss On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 15:03 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Yes, that's probably better. More code change ... making it more > readable. > > I'll check it in that way (or, maybe you can, since I can't reach the > git repo)? OK, I will check it into oss.sgi.com using the code the way I suggested. -Alex _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs