From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p8QCRojR160277 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 07:27:50 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: test timestamps before the epoch From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: <20110926112716.GA22382@infradead.org> References: <4E778C51.7040100@redhat.com> <20110926112716.GA22382@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 07:27:49 -0500 Message-ID: <1317040069.3030.18.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Eric Sandeen , xfs-oss On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 07:27 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This one actually ends up failing on XFS for me: > > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > QA output created by 258 > Creating file with timestamp of Jan 1, 1960 > -Stat of file yields: -315593940 > +Stat of file yields: -315615540 > Remounting to flush cache > -Stat of file yields: -315593940 > +Stat of file yields: -315615540 > > Note that we still get the same for both, it just seems XFS rounds it > a bit different. I haven't seen this one fail. Must have to do with some FS configuration options (like blocksize or something). -Alex _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs