public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsdump: update summaries in preparation for release 3.0.6
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 05:43:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1318502608.3172.22.camel@doink> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111010163423.GD11902@infradead.org>

On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 12:34 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:10:33PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> > The following is a draft of summaries to be included in the next
> > release of xfsdump.
> 
> The content looks good, but it's fairly different and much more verbose
> style than we traditionally did, which also generally focussed on user
> visible changes.

This is pretty reasonable feedback and I guess not a
surprise to me.  I was sort of throwing these together
at the end of a long day and didn't really distill them
down before sending them out.

I'll take another pass at all of them and will re-post.
Thanks.

					-Alex

> This is how I would have written the log in the "old" style:
> 
> xfsdump-3.0.6 (5 October 2011)
> 	- unconditionally add checksums to various dump headers in
> 	  xfsdump.
> 	- verify checksums if present in xfsrestore.
> 	- use the POSIX signal API instead of the legacy SysV API.
> 	- various internal cleanups and refactoring in xfsdump and
> 	  xfsrestore.
> 	- lift the limit of options in dialogs from 8 to 99.
> 	- various build system fixes, thanks to Ted Ts'o.
> 
> same applies to the other logs.



_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2011-10-13 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-05 22:10 [PATCH] xfsdump: update summaries in preparation for release 3.0.6 Alex Elder
2011-10-05 22:34 ` Bill Kendall
2011-10-10 16:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-13 10:43   ` Alex Elder [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1318502608.3172.22.camel@doink \
    --to=aelder@sgi.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox