From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p9DB6pt1168011 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:06:52 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] xfstests: allow 091 for non-xfs filesystems From: Alex Elder In-Reply-To: <20111011141840.GA14750@infradead.org> References: <20111010182156.GA1323@infradead.org> <20111010182216.GA1335@infradead.org> <20111010182233.GB1335@infradead.org> <20111011141840.GA14750@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:06:45 -0500 Message-ID: <1318504005.3172.29.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 10:18 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The tests in 091 are entirely generic and pass e.g. on ext4 and jfs. > btrfs fails it, but that looks a like a btrfs-specific issue to me. > > Also use _supported_os properly instead of erroring out manually on > IRIX. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Looks OK to me. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs