From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p9ML8sLk183446 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:08:54 -0500 Message-ID: <1319317728.3297.2.camel@doink> Subject: Re: Can you please create a git tree mirror on git.kernel.org? From: Alex Elder Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:08:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111020083307.GA16743@infradead.org> References: <4E9F8BE0.9010407@cn.fujitsu.com> <20111020035308.GG21338@dastard> <4E9FA3E9.4050507@cn.fujitsu.com> <20111020075334.GH21338@dastard> <20111020083307.GA16743@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Wanlong Gao , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 04:33 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 06:53:34PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > As it is, I'm not sure we're going to put those trees back on > > kernel.org - there's been no discussion I've seen about doing this, > > and the absence of the trees hasn't hurt us at all thanks to Alex > > pushing stuff into the oss.sgi.com trees quickly. > > I'd like to put them back. Right now it means we have a single point > of failure, and overload Alex who is pretty busy already. My plan all along has been to update the kernel.org trees when that became possible. I have not yet updated my various credentials and have not re-synched kernel.org. I am out of town and will be until Tuesday night. This is my first time back online for a few days. I expect to be updating things this coming week, unless I run into some sort of roadblock. -Alex > > And FWIW, I'm not planning on putting my dev trees back on > > kernel.org any time soon - too many hoops to jump through now. I'll > > probably use github or some other site for doing that when the need > > arises. > > Of course we'd need all the regular contributors to have access, > otherwise a shared repository is rather pointless. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs